• Prosím skopíruj a vlož chybové hlásenie, ktoré si videl na obrazovke, ak sa nejaké vyskytlo.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Prosím vysvetli, čo si chcel/a spraviť, čo si spravil/a a čo sa stalo

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Skopíruj/vlož text zobrazený v angličtine namiesto tvojho jazyka. Ak máš screenshot (dobrý zvyk), môžeš použiť Imgur.com na jeho nahranie a skopírovať sem odkaz na neho.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Je tento text dostupný v prekladovom systéme? Ak áno, bol preložený po dlhšie ako 24 hodín?

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Prosím presne a stručne vysvetli svoj podnet, aby bolo čo najjednoduchšie pochopiť, ako to myslíš.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Čo sa objavilo na obrazovke, keď si bol zablokovaný (Prázdna obrazovka? Časť herného rozhrania? Chybové hlásenie?)?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Ktorá časť pravidiel nebola dodržaná v BGA adaptácii?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Je možné vidieť porušenie pravidiel na zázname z hry? Ak áno, aké je číslo ťahu?

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Aký herný ťah si chcel urobiť?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Čo si skúsil aby si vyvolal túto akciu?

• Čo sa stalo keď si spravil túto hernú akciu (chybové hlásenie, hlásenie v stavovom pruhu, ...)?

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Kedy v priebehu hry sa problém vyskytol (aká bola prebiehajúca herná inštrukcia)?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Čo sa stalo keď si spravil túto hernú akciu (chybové hlásenie, hlásenie v stavovom pruhu, ...)?

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Prosím popíš viditeľný problém. Ak máš screenshot (dobrý zvyk), môžeš použiť Imgur.com na jeho nahranie a skopírovať sem odkaz na neho.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Skopíruj/vlož text zobrazený v angličtine namiesto tvojho jazyka. Ak máš screenshot (dobrý zvyk), môžeš použiť Imgur.com na jeho nahranie a skopírovať sem odkaz na neho.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Je tento text dostupný v prekladovom systéme? Ak áno, bol preložený po dlhšie ako 24 hodín?

• Aký prehliadač používaš?

• Prosím presne a stručne vysvetli svoj podnet, aby bolo čo najjednoduchšie pochopiť, ako to myslíš.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Aký prehliadač používaš?